|
The
realities of the online marketplace - the lessons to be drawn
from a recent European Consumer Centre's Network study
A
recent study published by the European Consumer Centre's Network
entitled "Realities of the European online marketplace"
(which included a review of 15 Irish web traders out of a
total of 262 web sites) revealed some very interesting findings.
Over a period running from the end of 2002 into the early
part of 2003, 114 orders for goods were made and 262 websites
were examined.
The products chosen for the study sought to reflect the "popular
Internet purchases" and included; clothes, computer consumables,
CD's, DVD's, toys, books and a watch.
The primary focus was to see how the reality of the online
shopping experience compared with the requirements of the
Distance Selling and the E-Commerce Directives with a special
focus on the cooling- off period.
For businesses that are trading online or intending to grow
this channel there are some very important lessons to be drawn
from this study.
Here are some of the more interesting findings;
- Although
the Internet is perceived as "a global marketplace"
the majority of EU online traders surveyed only operate
in their domestic market. A small minority operate cross
border. Some of the websites surveyed specifically excluded
cross border sales and others not engaged in cross border
sales failed to make this clear.
-
Overall the study categorised the "online shopping
experience" as poor. In many instances orders were
not delivered, essential information about consumer's
rights was omitted and the cost of returned goods was
not reimbursed.
-
Of the total of 114 orders placed only 75 resulted in
a delivery. In other words 34% of the products ordered
were not delivered and in 8% of the cases the products
were not delivered even though they had been paid for.
-
In 24% of the cases where credit cards were used, payment
withdrawn before the goods ordered had been delivered.
-
Where goods were returned in 31.5% of the cases no refund
was received and in only 37% of the cases did the return
result in a refund including the delivery fee.
- 8%
of the orders placed generated no response whatever from
the online trader.
-
18% of the orders were confirmed but no delivery was effected.
-
In 5% of the cases no order confirmation was received
but the goods were subsequently delivered.
- 8%
of the orders resulted in an order confirmation, a charge
for the goods but no delivery.
-
3.5% of the orders were confirmed, delivered but not charged.
- 57%
of the orders resulted in confirmation of the order, delivery
of the goods and the charge being deducted.
- The
overall delivery rate for goods ordered only amounted
to 66%
The
relevant EU Directives impose certain clear obligations on
businesses selling to consumers online. The study revealed
some interesting findings about these requirements which are
briefly outlined below:
Final Cost
All websites selling to consumers as well as order confirmations
must clearly state the total price of the transaction including
delivery fees to be debited. A comparison between the confirmed
and charged price found them to be the same in 96% of the
cases.
Receipt or Invoice
Consumers must receive a receipt or equivalent record of the
transaction. 83% of the deliveries included such a receipt.
Information in writing of revocation and returning rights.
Online traders must give consumers information on how to return
goods if dissatisfied as well as outlining the consumer's
right to return the goods during the "cooling off period".
Online traders can provide this information on the website
or with the order confirmation but best practice would also
include this information when delivery is made.
36% of the deliveries included this information. However only
56% of the deliveries contained information as to how to exercise
the right in the case of the particular transaction.
After-sales service, warranty and guarantee conditions
Equivalent requirements exist here as for revocation and return.
The study showed that only 31% of the deliveries included
this information.
Returns
As referred to above, consumers have the right to avail
of the right to return the goods purchased during the "cooling
off period" and to be informed of this right. The study
found that in 56% of the deliveries this information was not
provided.
Consumers are not obliged to give a reason for returning the
goods yet the study found that in 24% of the cases the web
trader concerned demanded a reason for the return.
The Distance Selling Directive requires that the only cost
that the consumer should pay in returning goods ordered is
the direct cost of returning the goods - in other words the
return freight charge. This means that if the web trader charged
a delivery fee to the consumer this should be refunded.
The study found that in 63% of the cases where goods were
returned either no refund was made or the refund made excluded
the delivery charges that had been levied.
Conclusions
This study has thrown up some very interesting findings which
point to some serious concerns about the realities of cross
border consumer shopping - concerning the failure to meet
the legal requirements laid down by the Directives.
As an example - the report authors point out that it is hardly
satisfactory if only 66% of the goods ordered were in fact
delivered, or that in 24% of the cases the consumer paid for
the goods before delivery or that in only 56% of the cases
did the web trader inform the consumer of its returns procedures.
This study suggests that in reality cross border consumer
shopping is not yet that "consumer friendly" which
would point to the existence of a clear inhibitor to the growth
of this important sector.
The Director of Consumer Affairs is on record as saying that
her office will take enforcement action for breaches of the
Distance Selling and E-Commerce Directives - so it is important
that Irish web traders take steps to address any deficiencies
in their online operations especially as regards sales to
consumers.
For
further information contact:
Patrick Ryan at
Email : pryan@kilroys.ie
© Kilroys Solicitors 2004
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|