
Compliance
with the Public Procurement Directives Introduction
Public
procurement, the process by which public contracts are awarded
by state, local, regional or municipal authorities or public
bodies is a hugely significant area of economic activity.
Ireland is presently going through a massive period of infrastructural
expansion. The National Development Plan was published in
1999. The latest estimate, factoring in the costs of inflation,
suggests that it could cost in the region of €75 billion
if it is fully implemented. High profile projects include
the various road projects, the Luas project, the mooted
Metro project and the like.
The
Directives The
Directives, which constitute the framework for the application
of EU law to the Public Procurement process, are as follows: - - Council
Directive 93/36/EEC (the Supplies Directive).
- Council
Directive 93/37/EEC (the Works Directive).
-
Council Directive 92/50/EEC (the Services Directive).
- Council
Directive 93/38/EEC (the Utilities Directive).
The
Remedies Directives In
support of these Procurement Directives, there are two Directives,
which specifically deal with remedies called "the Remedies
Directives": - - Council
Directive 89/665/EEC governs the procedures for reviewing the
awards of contracts under the Supplies Directive, the Works Directive
and the Services Directive.
- Council
Directive 92/13/EEC governs the rules applicable to the review
of procedures under the Utilities Directive.
Both
these Remedies Directives have been implemented into Irish law
by SI No. 309/1994 and SI No. 104/1993. Typical
Breaches So
what are the problems that give rise to alleged breaches of the
public procurement rules contained in these Directives? Breaches
can be deliberate or they can be inadvertent. Here are some typical
examples of the type of problems that have arisen over the years:
-
- Deliberate
splitting of contracts so as to defeat the relevant applicable
threshold;
-
Failure to supply interested parties with full and accurate
information;
-
Inclusion of discriminatory requirements in the tender documentation;
-
Failure to comply with the relevant advertising rules for
the various award; procedures;
-
Failure to comply with the technical rules;
-
omitting to refer to accepted European standards;
-
discriminatory application of national standards so
as to favour national suppliers. In this instance, one
of the most important ECJ cases is a decision that dates
from 1988 in the case; Commission -v- Ireland (the Dundalk
Pipeline");
- Failure
to comply with the selection rules;
- Failure
to comply with the contract award rules.
The
latter failure perhaps constitutes one of the most significant
problems. Issues that have arisen include: -
- The
discriminatory use of the criterion of the most economically
advantageous tender as opposed to lowest price;
- Improper
negotiation in the course of the open or restricted procedures;
-
Use of award criteria not published to interested parties;
-
Substantial amendments to the contract documentation post-tender,
with the effect that certain tenderers were eliminated;
-
The use of non-objective or transparent evaluation criteria;
-
The failure to properly comply with the procedures for dealing
with abnormally low tenders;
- The
misuse of the concept of unacceptable tenders.
The
Irish Experience
As
stated in the introduction to this paper, the public procurement
marketplace in Europe is enormous and growing. In the Irish
economic context, it is hugely significant. It is fair to
say that by and large, the application of the public procurement
rules in Ireland has largely speaking, been satisfactory.
Monitoring
of proper compliance with the Directives by the national courts
and at an EU level is at best, haphazard. Many of the infringements
of the public procurement rules that have been complained of over
the years result from a poor knowledge of the applicable rules.
It is imperative that public authorities engaged in the award
of public contracts which fall within the remit of the various
Directives and which are of a value above the relevant threshold,
properly comply with the procedures laid down in the Directives. In
the Irish context, particularly because of the size of the collective
procurement budgets year on year, it is important to ensure that
the public procurement process is opened up to the greatest extent
possible, so that the SME sector can participate to the greatest
extent possible. In
a recent study publicised in the Irish Times, a Trinity College
economist was reported as suggesting that greater efficiencies
needed to be created in the public procurement sector in Ireland
and that greater competition is needed to maximise efficiencies.
The more people that are aware of public procurement opportunities,
the greater the scope for ensuring an effective competitive process.
Again,
it is fair to say that Ireland's record, quite apart from
any criticisms that might be levied on the grounds of economic
inefficiencies, is reasonably good. Recent initiatives, such
as the establishment of the dedicated government procurement
portal www.e-tenders.gov.ie
point to the continuing commitment of the public sector to
publicise as widely as possible, procurement opportunities
within Ireland as they arise.
Conclusions
Clearly,
in an EU wide context, there is room for improvement, especially
with regard to measures that can be adopted to improve the participation
of SME's in public procurement opportunities. There are a number
of EU initiatives in this regard, which seek to promote measures
such as: -
- The
promotion of partnership between SME's in different regions
of the EU to foster their participation on a reciprocal
basis in public contracts;
- The
improvement of the information flow and to this end, the
Irish Government procurement portal initiative is to be
commended;
-
The provision of technical, legal and linguistic assistance
in the preparation and processing of tenders and in the
admission to purchasing authorities pre-qualification lists;
- The
provision of specialised public procurement training;
-
The provision of promotional and awareness raising activities
throughout the EU.
For
further information or general enquiries contact: -
Patrick Ryan
Email: pryan@kilroys.ie
or
Kevin O'Gara
E-mail: kogara@kilroys.ie
Telephone: +3531-439 5600
Fax: +3531-439 5601/439 5602
©
Kilroys Solicitors 2002

|